Back to Skincare leaderboard

Entity Page · Industry · Skincare

La Roche-Posay AI Visibility in Skincare

La Roche-Posay currently ranks #3 in the Skincare leaderboard with an overall AI visibility score of 41.8 across 6 tracked engines. Its strongest recent performance appears in Qwen with a 61.4 AI Index, which makes that engine the clearest source of current recommendation strength.

Entity Score
42
Leaderboard rank #3 of 30
Industry Rank
#3
Engines Covered
6
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
Jun 2, 2026

Entity Snapshot

La Roche-Posay is currently #3 out of 30 entities in Skincare, with a 41.8 overall AI visibility score across 6 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.

Strongest visibility currently comes from Qwen (61.4 AI Index, 28.6% mention rate) and gemini (56.1 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate). These engines provide the best evidence that the brand is being selected consistently when AI systems answer this category.

Visibility is relatively weaker in DeepSeek (5.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate) and MiniMax (36.4 AI Index, 28.6% mention rate). Those lower-scoring engines are the main places to investigate if recommendation consistency needs to improve.

La Roche-Posay's strongest current visibility comes from Qwen (61.4 AI Index, 28.6% mention rate) and gemini (56.1 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is DeepSeek (5.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate) and MiniMax (36.4 AI Index, 28.6% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for La Roche-Posay or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

La Roche-Posay has softened in recent runs, moving from 55.8 to 36.1 for a -19.7 point change. The weaker engines are the first places to inspect.

La Roche-Posay softened over the visible trend window, moving from 55.8 on 2026-04-29 to 36.1 on 2026-06-02. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

La Roche-Posay softened over the visible trend window, moving from 55.8 on 2026-04-29 to 36.1 on 2026-06-02. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

Engine Breakdown

ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Jun 2, 2026
Rank
#5
AI Index
46.1
Mention Rate
14.3%
gemini
gemini
Jun 2, 2026
Rank
#2
AI Index
56.1
Mention Rate
14.3%
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
Jun 2, 2026
Rank
#8
AI Index
5.7
Mention Rate
14.3%
MiniMax
MiniMax
Jun 2, 2026
Rank
#3
AI Index
36.4
Mention Rate
28.6%
Qwen
Qwen
May 24, 2026
Rank
#2
AI Index
61.4
Mention Rate
28.6%
Kimi
Kimi
May 24, 2026
Rank
#5
AI Index
45.1
Mention Rate
14.3%

Comparable Entities

CeraVe is the closest comparable entity by rank, with La Roche-Posay behind it by 1.6 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is La Roche-Posay ranked in the Skincare leaderboard?

La Roche-Posay is ranked using its current overall AI visibility score across tracked engines in Skincare, combining rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for La Roche-Posay?

The latest engine breakdown shows the strongest visibility in Qwen and relatively weaker visibility in DeepSeek.

Which entities should be compared with La Roche-Posay?

La Roche-Posay is compared most directly with CeraVe, L'Oréal Paris, and Estée Lauder in the current Skincare leaderboard.

How often is this page updated?

The page updates whenever new completed leaderboard runs are available for this industry.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 6 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Skincare.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.